Three Scrooges, Part 3: Song and Dance Men
Thought of the Blog: Dickens says that Bob Cratchet had only
met Scrooge’s nephew once (this was in Stave Four in the future: "Mr. Scrooge's nephew, whon he had scarcely seen but once" – an odd way of putting it if they had met more
often than once). This was when Fred visited Scrooge at his counting
house and invited him to Christmas dinner.
This
implies one of two things – either this is the first time Fred had come to
Scrooge’s counting house for any reason, let along to invite him to his party
(Stave Three says he WILL go by year after year but not necessarily HAS in the
past); or, if Fred HAS been inviting Scrooge year after year, Cratchet has only
been working for Scrooge over the past 364 days at MOST. When Scrooge says, “You’ll
want all day tomorrow…” was this the FIRST time he asked this to Cratchet, or
was this an annual conversation. It seems to imply this has happened before –
getting all day off – perhaps Scrooge comes to expect this from his clerks.
If
Cratchet has only been at his job less than a year – what of the other
clerks? How many has Scrooge had over
the years? Can you imagine the job interview? Where had Cratchet worked before?
Was he that bad of a clerk this was the only position available? I would think
not many people would recommend Scrooge and Marley as an ideal work environment…
WELL KNOWN SCROOGES
In the
late 1960s the Hollywood Musical* as a genre was on its last great gasp. In the
1970s they were as rare as a Jennifer Aniston blockbuster – for every “Cabaret”
there were ten “Mame”s. The theaters
were dominated by big-budget wide-screen epics including “Fiddler on the Roof”
and “Oliver!” A Dickens tale as a
musical? Sure, and if it worked once…
*Note
that “Scrooge” was filmed and produced in England
and therefore not, literally, a Hollywood Musical, but it snuggled nicely into
the genre.
“Scrooge”
was released in 1970 and starred Albert Finney in the title role. It received
four Oscar nominations and Finney won a Golden Globe. It was well received
critically.
Several
things differentiate this version of the tale – not least of which is the
music. Most “Christmas Carols” contain music – usually brass band versions of
old Christmas songs, a small choir singing carols, Tiny Tim’s Peter-Brady-like-cringe-worthy
renditions of various tunes; and the occasional song during Fezziwig’s and Fred’s
parties. But this was a Musical with a capital “M” – the songs had little to do
with the holiday and more to do with reflecting the mood and emotion of the
moment: teasing children belt out “Father Christmas”. “December the 25th”is a fun tune
at Fezziwig’s party but not the kind that would become a Christmas classic.
There is the genuinely sad “You … you” during which we see the exact moment
when the adult Scrooge shut himself off from the world and when his older self
realized what he had become. Most people remember the unbelievably catchy
“Thank You Very Much” sung twice during the movie. You’ll be humming it all day
now.
Its unique moments are what
stand out – seeing the face of the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come and the
scenes set in hell – no other version of the tale has this (“Disney’s Christmas
Carol shows a vague face and a coffin deep in the glowing earth, so it is
close). In fact, it’s not in the novel at all. But I don’t mind that – if I
want a faithful rendition of the novel I would hardly expect it from a musical.
And it
is always fun to see Alec Guinness try to sing. Being of my generation, I did
not realize Alec Guinness was Marley until after I had seen him in that OTHER
movie he was in. Therefore, I will always associate him with that OTHER movie
first. Put another way, every time I see “Scrooge” and the ghost of Marley
enters I expect him to say, “Go to Dagobah, Ebenezer, and learn from Yoda…”
RARE SCROOGES
Mister
Magoo’s Christmas Carol (1962). WHAT!? This classic is put in the “rare”
category!? Yes, in the 1970s it was on TV quite a bit, but it went decades
without rebroadcasting. Maybe where you live some local station aired it, but
not in my market. Not even the cable channels. It has come back to television
recently though – TiVo has helped me find it. This cartoon is usually at the top
of most favorites list, so I suspect the show has aired elsewhere annually or I
just missed it. For twenty years. … Hmm, I stand by its rarity.
Now
this Magoo isn’t the doddering racist from the weekly cartoon; this is the
Magoo from the 1950s UPA shorts – still blind as a bat but painting, hunting,
camping as if nothing is remiss. Unfortunately most of those shorts are long gone.
It
presents itself as a musical – hence its inclusion here. The titles bring the
tunes to mind – which is a good indication of their longevity – Lord’s Bright
Blessing, Ringle Ringle, etc. The songs
were written by the same team that wrote the tunes to “Funny Girl” – which
explains why the songs rank so high in retention.
Jim
Backus does the definitive voice of Magoo, the immortal Paul Frees also
provides voices. So does Morey Amsterdam – immortal in his own way as Buddy
Sorrell (remember him stealing the show on the Christmas episode of Dick Van
Dyke? Or for that matter … of every episode of Dick Van Dyke?).
Its
unique moments:
1. It
begins and ends with Magoo and the other characters preparing to perform Carol
on stage. In between acts the curtain closes to begin the commercial break. We
are watching a cartoon pretending to be a stage production of “A Christmas
Carol”.
2. Gerald
McBoingboing speaks!?
3. This
was the first holiday cartoon produced specifically for television. It paved
the way for Charlie Brown, Rudolph and all the other animated “Christmas
Carols”.
4. The
ghosts were out of order! The Ghost of Christmas Present was first! I have
always remembered that: this was one of my first (not THE first – that was the
1969 cartoon) exposure to “Christmas Carol” and I always wondered why “later”
versions had the ghosts appear out of order.
UNSEEN SCROOGES (version I have not seen but will review
anyway, oh like that’s never been done by professional critics…)
Near
the end of NBC’s reign as the #1 broadcast network, it collected some of its
stars to be in a musical version of “A Christmas Carol: The Musical” in 2004.
It was based on an earlier stage musical.
Kelsey
Grammer took a break from Frazier to play Scrooge. Other NBC stars such as Law
& Order’s Jesse L. Martin and Seinfeld’s Jason Alexander was Marley.
I tried
watching it, I really did. But I lost interest quickly and turned the channel.
The musical numbers were not that catchy and I found it kind of boring. To me it added nothing unique to the tale.
It was
fun watching Martin and Alexander sing and dance. Seinfeld fans are usually
shocked to know Alexander is quite different from his shlub-counterpart George
Costanza. Likewise Martin – given his and L&O partner Jerry Orbach’s
legendary musical theater background it is too bad the two of them never did
anything else together.
I
watched it when it was broadcast. I tried watching it again the next year
during a repeat with the same feeling of ennui. I’ve yet to see it all the way
through. Maybe it picks up at the end. I doubt it…
NEXT: The Sounds of Silence
Copyright 2012 Michael
G. Curry
The 2004 production (I did manage to watch it all the way through a few years ago) is guilty mainly of the crime you mention: It adds nothing to what has come before. Good cast, classic material, decent production values, performances given and not phoned in, and yet there was just no spark. I can't recall a single song from it, so one could argue that it's main failure is as a musical rather than a straight take. Have never seen the Mr. Magoo one, yet, but also noticed it often makes the upper ranks of people's favorite versions.
ReplyDelete