Three Scrooges, Part 11: Personal Best (my favorite
versions)
Thought
of the blog: How much do you think Scrooge donated to the solicitors that
Christmas morning? In George C. Scott’s Carol movie, it is obvious they are
mouthing “a thousand pounds” that would more than likely have been just over
$150,000 US. Back payments indeed!
WELL KNOWN SCROOGES
“A
Christmas Carol” starring George C. Scott as Scrooge was a made-for-television
film shown on CBS in 1984. It was the first serious attempt at a Carol movie in
thirty-three years. All previous adaptations were animated features, musicals
or a spoof/homage from current television programs. As such it was the first serious adaptation
to be filmed in color.
This is
without question my favorite version. The acting and characters are superb. The
scenery is beautiful. Its flaws are small and insignificant compared to the
majesty of the film.
Uniqueness:
it’s loyalty to the original story makes for very few scenes that are not in
the book, but they exist. Changes were had because of Scott’s tinkering with
the character to reflect his “motivation”. They make sense: borrowing from
1951’s “Scrooge”, he was the younger child, Fen the older (Scrooge’s mother
died in childbirth and his father holds him a-grudge). We get to see Scrooge’s father for the only
time in any other adaptation (Scott standing defiantly behind his younger self
sends a shiver down the spine – staring down at the man who made him what he
was.
Missing:
not much. No trip to the miners/lighthouse/ship is the only part I can recall
missing other than Dickens’ asides. The debate between Scrooge and the Ghost of
Christmas Present about closing the bakeries on the Sabbath is missing (only “Disney’s
…” includes it to date). Too bad, it would have given the Ghost played by
Edward Woodward another reason to snarl at Scrooge.
There is
so much to love about the movie – not just the beauty of the settings. The
Ghost of Christmas Present’s verbal bitch-slapping of Scrooge to mind his
tongue when discussing the poor and destitute was the dramatic highlight.
Rather than cringe, Scrooge smirked and nodded, conceding the point.
Scrooge
meeting Fred’s wife for the first time says, “I was in love once, can you
imagine that?” “Yes, yes I can,” she says quietly. Scrooge then addresses his
nephew, “You will forgive me but I see the shadow of my sister in my face. … God forgive me for the time I’ve wasted.” A
moving scene.
Cratchet, mourning Tiny Tim, holds his
youngest daughter and cries, “my child; my little, little child”. If that does
not bring a tear to your eye, you have no soul.
Scenes
of poor families living under a bridge and cooking scraps found on the street is
not from the novel, but aptly placed.
His
descent into coldness was realistic; his conversion was realistic. That was
Scott’s point in tinkering with the “motivation” of Scrooge – these were not
caricatures or archetypes, these are (or at least should be) real people.
The book
says Scrooge was not a man of humor, but Scott imbues Scrooge with a sharp
intelligence and humor, wicked though it may be. “You’re devilishly hard to
have a conversation with,” he tells Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come.
The cast
is perfect – although Bob Cratchet could have looked a bit less robust. Tiny
Tim looked, well, tiny. And cute as a button.
The film
is a joy to watch. A joy.
RARE SCROOGES
The television show “WKRP in Cincinnati” aired
for three years on CBS. It was a documentary about the inner workings of a
radio station disguised as a sit-com.
IMHO it was the best thing ever to air on TV.
They did
two Christmas shows – one was a Carol spoof. Mr. Carlson played the Scrooge
character refusing to give out Christmas bonuses. He is visited by cast members
Jennifer (Loni Anderson never looked more beautiful than in this episode),
Venus Flytrap (Tim Reid having contagious fun) and Johnny Fever (a genuinely
creepy Howard Hesseman as the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come).
The
humor was, as always, character-driven, well-written and funny.
Ironically
I find the third visit the most melancholy. Fever shows Carlson the future of
the radio station. There was Herb Tarlek sitting at a desk while the automated
computer behind him broadcasting generic music (Christmas music) with presumably
generic DJs.
If you’ve
listened to the radio lately, you’ll know that despite Carlson’s conversion, the
dark future happened anyway. Most radio stations nowadays are composed of the
sales staff and a computer tech. It was
the only Christmas Carol in which Scrooge did NOT change the future…
UNSEEN SCROOGES (version I have not seen but will review
anyway, oh like that’s never been done by professional critics…)
“A
Christmas Carol” – an Australian 1982 animated feature. I have not yet seen the
movie, but it received glowing reviews. It is called the most complete and
accurate depiction of the novel done to date. Wow! I’ve got to YouTube THIS…
Next: Leftovers (a potpourri of Carols that didn’t quite fit...)
Copyright 2012 Michael
G. Curry
You review excellently well, sir. I wonder you don't go into Parlee-ment. ;) You know my affinity for the Scott version, and you certainly selected many of my reasons for loving this version dearly. Of all the WKRP I've seen, the Carlson-as-Scrooge episode I may have missed...it doesn't sound familiar. YouTube here I come... :)
ReplyDelete