The
Synergy of Science Fiction and Horror: the lost potential of “Event Horizon”.
The film “Event Horizon” was on
television over the weekend. I saw it in the theater when released in 1997 and
I wondered if it was really as laughably bad as I remembered it.
Time has mellowed my opinion of
it. It wasn’t bad. It wasn’t good
either, but it wasn’t bad.
Some of the movie’s worst crimes
mellowed on the small screen; by that I mean the cheap scare tactics weren’t as
bad when not amplified. When I left the theater in 1997 I told my friend (and
fellow movie-attendee) Jon, “Next time let’s save some money. Instead of paying
to see this movie, we should just randomly startle each other every two or
three minutes and achieve the same effect.”
This led throughout the night
and the next week or so with our conversations peppered with the following
routine.
“Jon?”
“Yes?”
“BOO!!”
That was the total sum of the
scariness of “Event Horizon” – build-up, build-up, build-up, soundtrack getting
more and more ominous ... and then … and then …
The music stopped, the
character’s fear was unfounded. The strange thingie he thought was approaching
him was … nothing. Sigh of relief.
Boo! Oh no! The thingie attacks!
Actual scene – Sam Neil hears
his dead wife’s voice. The lights fade in and out. “Sara?” Lights on, Sam is on
the right of the screen. Lights go out. Lights go on. Sam is still alone. Music
swells.
“Get it over with!” I shouted.
Lights go up. Nothing. He turns
to his right. Oh no! The ghost of his dead wife is to his right, not left!
Music swells! He screams! The horror! The horror!
A member of an
as-yet-undiscovered tribe in the Amazon would see that coming. And the movie is
filled with this tactic.
I still dislike the movie
despite the amazing cast. Sam Neill, Lawrence Fishburne, Kathleen Quinlin, Joely Richardson, Sean Pertwee (the son of
Doctor Who’s Jon Pertwee) and a pre-Draco
Malfoy Jason Isaacs. Richard Jones
overplays the black crewmember in all his token glory. He was the first one I
wanted to go… Of all the shortcuts taken in this movie his was the worst. The
other characters at least TRIED to appear three-dimensional. It was obvious the
writers, producers and directors could not handle horror. They apparently can’t
handle a black character that possesses dignity and self-respect either. The
film made LL Cool J from “Deep Blue Sea” seem like Poitier…
I was (and am) disappointed.
With the right tweeking here and there it could have been a horror masterpiece
up there with 1963’s “The Haunting” and perhaps even passing that OTHER famous
scary sci-fi movie … the mother of them all ... but more on “Alien” in a
moment.
Horror and science fiction fit
very well together. It’s like peanut butter and jelly. Some like peanut butter
with other things, some like jelly with other things, some like only one and
not the other, some like neither. But you cannot deny their popularity as a
team.
Or compare it to two brothers
who are identical yet a decade apart in age.
They go together even though at times they are vastly different.
“Frankenstein” is arguably the
first science fiction novel. If so it is definitely the first science
fiction/horror novel.
Of course, a movie or a book
with science fiction elements doesn’t make it science fiction; no more than a
book or movie with scary moments makes it a horror flick.
If that were the case “Godzilla”
and almost every monster movie would be labeled “sci-fi/horror”. They are
monster movies. Some are very good monster movies, but not sci-fi/horror. (“Deep Blue Sea” could be
considered a sci-fi/horror film, but it was more of a monster flick…)
Any sci-fi/horror blend has to
be compared to the movie “Alien”. Isn’t that a monster movie too? In a way, but
only in the way that a serial-killer movie is a monster movie. If “Alien” is a
monster movie, then so is “Silence of the Lambs”.
“Alien” had horrific situations
folded in science fiction trappings. Want an easy way to describe it? “Jaws” in
space. Or better – “Halloween” in space.
But making it that simple misses
the greatness of the movie. In “Alien” we have solid characters (not
necessarily likeable one, which is important) and truly frightening and/or
intense scenes. Hitchcock would have approved of the monitor scene. The alien
is shown as an electronic blip slowly approaching the captain in an access
crawl space. We see it coming and all we can do is what Ripley did, “Run! He’s
getting closer!”
It is good science fiction and
scary as hell. The sequel “Aliens” is also a good movie, but it is works better
as an action movie than a horror movie. That’s not a bad thing, but it does
make a difference. You watch “Aliens” to be thrilled and cheer on the good
guys, not to be scared or creeped out.
The bad guys in “Event Horizon”
were originally written to be an alien race. The movie-makers wanted to wisely
avoid the “Alien” comparison and decided to get their horror from another vein.
They went Lovecraftian. The pitched it
as “The Shining” in space.
This is why I had such high
hopes for the film. The few moments of true creepiness were overshadowed by
“the startle” – the cheap way to get a scare (“Boo!”). They should have let a horror writer come up
with ideas.
Ironically, Sam Neil appeared in
one of the most genuinely scary movies out there - “In the Mouth of Madness”. A
flick firmly ensconced in the Lovecraft/Stephen King mold. Plus it was directed
by John Carpenter. That kind of fear-making should have been incorporated into
“Event Horizon”.
I’m reminded of an episode of
“Star Trek: The Next Generation” called “Night Terrors”. The crew finds a
missing Federation starship as a derelict with the crew missing (except one).
They discovered that the crew of the missing ship killed each other and the
Enterprise crew starts exhibiting the same symptoms – paranoia, violence and
hostility. That’s the plot of “Event Horizon” too…
There are moments when the “Star
Trek” could have been horrifying. When Dr. Crusher was in the morgue with the
dead crew of the missing ship, she hallucinated the bodies had sat up (the
audience never sees the bodies move). She clenched her eyes shut and the scene
pans out to show the bodies lying on their slabs again. I waited for the next inevitable moment, but
it never happened. The show moved on to the next scene.
The bodies should have
flailed. They should have thrashed
around while the doctor screamed her pretty red head off. A scary moment
missed.
That was “Event Horizon” – the
scary moments were right there. Right. There. Ready to be exploited. But it
went for the “Boo!”
Or it went for the gore.
Evisceration is not scary. The before and after, if done right, can be.
A shame, really. Such potential.
That’s why I still don’t like “Event Horizon”.
Copyright 2013 Michael G. Curry